Essay Writer for All Kinds of Papers -
Close Reading & Text-Dependent Questions
block pattern essays This topic contains 0 replies, has 1 voice, and was last updated by jvalberkthuratot 5 days, 14 hours ago. Point By Point Pattern Essay Writing. Write Better Essays Now Essay editing Ad Correct All Writing Mistakes And Plagiarism In Your Essays Now! PDF Organizational Patterns for the Comparison/Contrast Essay San Jose State University Writing Center This organizational pattern is most effective when used on amelia questions, short the number of points discussed in the essay . Argumentative essay point by point pattern Seger Dental Argumentative essay point by point pattern . Kontakta Introduction outline for argumentative essay essay writing service reviews uk office transition words to use PDF Block vs. Point-by-Point Organization in Comparison/Contrast Block vs. Point-by-Point Organization in Comparison/Contrast Essays Block Structure In block structure you write about essay each topic in earhart essay, a separate block. Short Essay Civil! How to Write an Argumentative Essay on amelia earhart essay, any Topic How to Write an the crucible, Argumentative Essay on any one for each pro or con point . 3-CON Pattern . After choosing an amelia essay, essay pattern , now all you need is to write your Point By Point Pattern Essay Writer offroadtaxi.com Essays . the block pattern • the point-by-point pattern ; contrast is a common form of academic writing , either as an in thesis, essay For the earhart questions, point-by Point-by-Point vs Block-Style Essay YouTube In this video, I highlight the introduction glass menagerie, basic differences between point-by-point and amelia block-style essay structures, and I give examples of both for a compare and Resources for Writers: Comparison Writing Drew University Comparison Writing : The point-by-point pattern is essential if your material is complicated or if you can begin the essay with what you consider to introduction, be your. Sample essay of comparison using point-by-point method specifics then need to be tested in the actual writing ; of course, you will also make How to Write a Point by Point Comparison Essay | Synonym How to Write a Point by essay, Point Comparison Essay By Rebecca Grieser.
Learning how to write comparison essays is an important skill in both high school and on smoking conclusion college. Comparison Essay Point by essay questions, Point Introduce both items of comparison and state a thesis at essay on smoking the end that makes a point about the amelia questions, two. All people experience PDF UT POINT BY POINT PATTERN Short Argumentative Essay Outline UT POINT BY POINT PATTERN Short Argumentative Essay Outline See our Writing Guide Writing an Argumentative Essay , pp. 6-7. 1. 2. 3. Argumentative essay point by point pattern Argumentative Essay detailed writing guide including essay structure patterns , introduction and conclusion techniques, useful examples, tips and is methodology writing best practices. PDF Writing a Compare/Contrast Essay Writing a Compare/Contrast Essay Point by Point Method My Essay o Introduction o introduction of general topic o specific topic o areas to be covered in this Comparison and amelia Contrast Essay : Block Method Comparison and Contrast Essay : Block Method There are two basic patterns writers use for comparison/contrast essays : the notes scandal, block method and the point-by-point method. PDF Comparison and Contrast Essays Saint Mary#x27;s University Comparison and Contrast Essays The pattern is as follows: o Point 1 about A o Point 2 about A o Etc. Earhart Questions! o Point 1 about B (with discussion about connections to A) Example of argumentative essay point by essay quellenangabe, point pattern You can use a block pattern or a point-by Essay example; Argumentative Essay on Writing an earhart, Argumentative Essay First pOint and The persuasive essay follows the. PDF How Do I Write a Comparison/Contrast Essay ? How Do I Write a Comparison/Contrast Essay ? There are several ways of writing a comparison/contrast essay , of each main idea point by point , Organization Compare and Contrast Workout CUNY Write Site Compare and Contrast Workout The two things are compared and contrasted point by point or to the alternating pattern ? In the box below, write an outline Writing an Argumentative Essay | Essays | Argument LFCS001 English Communication Skills Writing an Argumentative Essay Essay 11 Body of Point-by-Point Pattern Writing selected and interviewed.) Essay PDF Organizational Patterns for the Comparison/Contrast Essay Organizational Patterns for on arthur the crucible, the Comparison/Contrast Essay , Spring 2010. Rev. Summer 2014.
3 of 4 Second Point : Discuss point #2 of both subjects, comparing and amelia essay PDF Point-by-Point Compare and Contrast Essay indicating pattern First point of comparison Second point of comparison. Point-by-Point Compare and Contrast Essay Third point of essay on arthur miller the crucible, comparison PDF Compare Contrast Explanation and earhart questions Examples Weebly Revised from Compare and Contrast by essay quellenangabe, Michelle Bic knell/MJC Writing Center Point by Point Method Outline for an Entire Essay Thesis (what you are trying to show): Block Organization And Point By Point Organization? Comparison and contrast writing is usually organized in one of amelia essay, two ways which are called block organization and point by write your first half of the essay COMPARISON AND CONTRAST Cameron University COMPARISON AND CONTRAST. indicate that you should use a comparison-and-contrast pattern to essay quellenangabe, organize your essay . you write a point-by-point Comparison/Contrast Essays : Two Patterns Gallaudet University Second Pattern : Point-by-Point . Earhart Essay! This second example is notes on a essay also an essay about amelia abortion. We have used the essay on smoking, same information and line of amelia earhart questions, reasoning in is methodology in thesis writing, this essay , however five-paragraph argumentative essay ESLWeb.org I found this website very useful for the first time we want to essay, have our students write a short argumentative essay . (Block pattern and Point-by-Point pattern ) What#x27;s the difference between subject by subject pattern What#x27;s the difference between subject by essay, subject pattern point by point pattern when comparing are going to earhart essay, be comparing to write the essay How to Write an A+ Comparison Essay on any Topic How to Write an A+ Comparison Essay on essay on smoking, any Topic. Published 3/10/2013. There are two recommended patterns for a comparison essay : point-by-point Write Block Pattern Essay santissimatrindade.com.br Comparison and Contrast Essay : Block Method amarris There are two basic patterns writers use for comparison/contrast essays : the block method and the point-by-point What is a Comparison / Contrast Essay EarthLink Follow these steps when writing a comparison / contrast essay . Amelia! 1. Write detailed characteristics for each point . Choose a pattern to organize your essay . You must be logged in to reply to this topic. My hair was thinning and showing a bald spot. I experienced good results with propecia, I had to quit a year ago because of side effects.
Since then, I have in desperation tried lots of hair loss treatment products. Quellenangabe! Now after over a half year of using DS DNC-L, I have some thinning but the original bald spot is gone, overall my hair looks normal. I can keep it short and earhart be happy with it. - Matt Marino 1. My hair was thinning and showing a bald spot. I experienced good results with propecia, I had to quit a year ago because of side effects. Since then, I have in on arthur miller, desperation tried lots of hair loss treatment products. Now after over a half year of using DS DNC-L, I have some thinning but the amelia questions, original bald spot is gone, overall my hair looks normal.
I can keep it short and be happy with it. - Matt Marino 2. Quellenangabe! My hair was thinning and showing a bald spot. I experienced good results with propecia, I had to quit a year ago because of side effects. Earhart! Since then, I have in desperation tried lots of hair loss treatment products. Now after over a half year of using DS DNC-L, I have some thinning but the essay conclusion, original bald spot is amelia gone, overall my hair looks normal. I can keep it short and be happy with it. - Matt Marino 3. My hair was thinning and showing a bald spot.
I experienced good results with propecia, I had to essay quellenangabe, quit a year ago because of side effects. Since then, I have in earhart questions, desperation tried lots of hair loss treatment products. Now after over a half year of using DS DNC-L, I have some thinning but the introduction menagerie essay, original bald spot is gone, overall my hair looks normal. I can keep it short and be happy with it. - Matt Marino 4.
Best Essay Writers Here -
Did Amelia Earhart survive a crash …
LEEWS (Law Essay Exam Writing/Preparation Science/System) changes the game! A proven effective (true) science of preparing for and executing the “A” essay exam, LEEWS is applicable to bar as well as law school exams. Unique, proven systems are put in essay, place for on arthur miller (systematically!) identifying issues [No more haphazard spotting!], presenting analysis in concise paragraphs (roughly one per issue), briefing cases in 2-4 lines(!!), taking far fewer class notes, and compiling condensed, effective, 30-50 page course outlines. And much more. Amelia Earhart Essay Questions. A law student learns—finally—to learn/think as a reasonable facsimile of a [practicing] lawyer. I briefed, outlined my notes, reviewed the law, but still felt totally unprepared for upcoming exams. This program was exactly what I needed €” the is methodology in thesis, tools to confidently tackle exams in a methodical way.
— Jan Court, Univ Texas '00. Just knowing you have a plan €” i.e., the steps €” keeps you from worrying about panic. €” Rob Goldbaum, U. Chicago '92. 3 Sample Law Essay Exams From the amelia, LEEWS Primer (with Model Responses) [And an example of LEEWS' effectiveness in practice.] 1 Actual Civil Procedure Exam With Model Response (written by a LEEWS grad) and Professor Comments. The entire grade (!!) in most law school courses will depend upon performance on a final exam, most if not all of essay, which is essay in earhart, nature. Persuasive Conclusion. (You are basically asked to identify and essay analyze so-called issues generated in a hypothetical [made up] and essay quellenangabe usually complex fact pattern, much as a lawyer might.) Most exams are 3-4 hours in length, and either closed or open book. The former means you bring nothing into the exam with you (save the code in amelia earhart essay questions, a course based on a code of rules [e.g., IRS Code in taxation, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in essay the crucible, civil procedure]).
Normally open book allows you to amelia questions bring in essay, class notes, textbook, outlines, whatever, which tends to reassure students. However, open book is misleading, as there is typically little time to refer to aids. Amelia. Open or closed book, the quellenangabe, law you need to amelia essay know should be in your head. Some professors offer take home exams, which may have 8-24 hour time limits, and what writing limits as to how much you can write or type. Grading is invariably anonymous to protect professors and students alike. Unlike college and graduate school, class participation, acquaintance with the earhart essay, professor, even midsemester (as opposed to what is methodology writing midyear) midterms generally have no bearing on law school grades. Ask professors themselves, or upperclass students about the grading policies and practices of individual professors. There follow three examples of amelia, essay hypotheticals selected from among the eight in the appendix of the LEEWS Primer. Following are models of the LEEWS approach to breaking fact patterns down into units corresponding to relevant issues [Planning Phase], as well as fully developed written responses corresponding to our format of concise paragraphs, roughly one per issue [Writing Phase]. The law needed to address each hypo is provided, as the subjects may as yet be unfamiliar to you. You may want to attempt a response before looking at the models.
Standard exam writing advice posits that you follow IRAC. I.e., identify the Issue, state the applicable Rule, Analyze, Conclude. (Sounds great, until you realize you don't know what an issue is, much less how to notes on a scandal essay identify all issues lurking in the fact pattern; you don't know how to analyze as a lawyer; and you don't know how to present analysis concisely.) Whether you are familiar with the three subjects tested or no, all essay exercises are predictable in nature. A typically complex and confusing fact pattern is followed by essay question(s)/instruction(s) that in effect require you to identify or spot the legal issues that would be of interest to a judge or lawyer. You must then resolve those issues, bringing to bear relevant law and the analytic dialectic between law and facts known as lawyerlike thinking.
Should you find yourself thinking, as you review the model responses, I don't think I can ever do that, unless you have a knack for taking such exams (possessed by only a small handful of persuasive essay on smoking conclusion, students -- 5-7%, even at Harvard), you are probably correct. Which is why so few law students manage even a single A on final exams. But rest assured that anyone with reasonable intelligence and diligence can produce such responses consistently. Showing you how is what LEEWS is all about -- for any exam in any subject, no matter the question(s)/instruction(s) posed by the professor. Civil Procedure Hypothetical (60 min.) Coris Becker, an occasional tennis player, fell while descending steps at the Only For Us Racquet Club in Long Island City, Queens County, New York. As she explained to earhart questions her husband moments later by for the essay phone: Not the most graceful move in the world, Morris. I got so mad, I smashed Mommy's new titanium Stroker. Amelia Essay. Be a dear and bring home din-din. I'm going to be in introduction for the glass menagerie essay, the hot tub for hours.
As she limped out to her Lexus, Coris ran into the club owner, Jett Setter. He grinned and remarked, I saw that spill, Coris. Not the most graceful move in the world. At which point Coris determined to sue Setter personally, as well as the club. Although a resident of Queens County, Coris, joined by her mother, Doris, a resident of Manhattan, New York County, brought suit against Only For Us Racquet Club, Inc. (OFU, Inc.) and Jett Setter personally in New York County, seeking damages for amelia earhart Coris' injury and the destruction of the tennis racquet. Thereupon followed, inter alia , the following events and motions: 1 €” OFU, Inc. and Setter moved for a change of venue to Queens County. 2 €” Attempts to serve Setter personally at his club were twice unsuccessful, so a copy of the notes on a scandal, summons and questions complaint was affixed to what the door of amelia questions, his home. Another was mailed to on a him. [So-called nail and mail service.] 3 €” Although the complaint affixed to his door separated from the summons and earhart essay blew away, and the mailed copy never arrived, Setter, by his attorney, appeared in the action, answered the what in thesis writing, complaint, interposed affirmative defenses, and amelia earhart essay questions otherwise defended against the action. Only later during an appeal did he assert lack of for the menagerie, personal jurisdiction as a defense.
4 €” OFU, Inc. served notice of the amelia essay, deposition of a person who, while standing in the next phone booth, had overheard Coris' conversation with her husband. Coris moved for a protective order forbidding disclosure of anything overheard as a privileged conversation. 5 €” OFU, Inc. requested an admission from Doris that Coris has a tendency to negligent behavior. Doris ignored it. 6 €” Following a directed verdict during trial dismissing her cause of action for destruction of the racquet, Doris immediately instituted a claim for damages on the same ground in small claims court, Manhattan. You are a law clerk to, where appropriate, both trial and introduction for the essay appellate judges assigned to this case. Prepare a memorandum of law respecting the issues raised in the above. Majority state law applies.
RELEVANT LEGAL PRINCIPLES FOR CIVIL PROCEDURE HYPO. (Such legal knowledge should be in your head as well as your course outline. Note: The law provided herein may or may not be currently accurate.) Discovery (scope of) €” Generally, all information not otherwise privileged that is relevant to the subject matter of the essay, action is discoverable, whether or not the material would be admissible as proof. Communications between spouses €” A confidential communication between husband and wife is privileged against in thesis writing, disclosure by either spouse or by a third person (e.g., an eavesdropper). Personal Jurisdiction €” Generally, in order to determine the rights and duties of parties to an action, and to amelia questions bind the on a scandal essay, parties personally to its determinations, a court must have in personam jurisdiction over said parties. Said jurisdiction will be had, inter alia, where a defendant is present in the state where an action is brought, and personally served with process. Where personal service on a defendant cannot be effected through due diligence, a plaintiff is entitled to substitute such service by affixing a copy of the summons and amelia complaint to the door or other conspicuous place at the defendant's last known address, and also mailing a copy of same by regular mail to said address (so-called nail and mail). A court has held that three attempts at in hand service at a defendant's place of short civil war, business, without attempting to serve the defendant at home or leave the summons and complaint with a person of earhart questions, suitable age and the crucible discretion at earhart essay, the place of business does not satisfy the requirements of is methodology in thesis, due diligence. Waiver of questions, €” Where a defendant appears, answers the essay on smoking conclusion, complaint, interposes defenses, and at earhart questions, no time during or after trial moves to dismiss based on, nor claims lack of personal jurisdiction, the defense will be deemed waived on appeal. Requests for admission €” A request for admission imposes a duty on the party served to acknowledge the existence of facts that are not in on arthur miller the crucible, doubt and that should not be necessary to prove at trial.
The party served normally has 30 days to respond. Failure to timely respond results in the matter being deemed admitted. Inter alia , it is permissible to earhart essay questions request that a party admit to a legal conclusion (e.g., that an employee was acting with authority, or that the essay on arthur miller, party was traveling against traffic on a one-way street). However, it is not proper to request an admission to an abstract statement of law (e.g., that allowing a minor without a license to drive is negligent, per se). Res Judicata €” Doctrine that for amelia earhart essay reasons of economy, prevention of harassment, and avoidance of inconsistent judicial rulings (policy!), the relitigation of claims and issues is generally prohibited. Claim preclusion €” Doctrine whereby a final judgment on essay miller, the merits of a claim or cause of action precludes reassertion of that claim or cause of action in a subsequent suit. Venue €” Refers to the proper place for trial of a lawsuit. The purpose of venue rules is to amelia essay questions prevent a plaintiff from forcing a defendant to trial where it would be burdensome for the crucible him to appear and defend (policy!). Unless compelling reasons exist to direct otherwise, a transitory action (meaning that the transaction which is the subject of the action could have happened anywhere) should be tried in the county where the action arose. MODEL RESPONSE TO CIVIL PROCEDURE HYPOTHETICAL. (1/4 - 1/3 of allotted time divided into 10-15 minute intervals)
Preliminary Overview €” Six distinct events/motions. Perform Steps One, Two, and Three (The Blender) on each is my initial perspective on how to proceed. [Always the Steps, always the Steps €” a constant way of thinking.] Step One €” [Conflict pairings and party objective(s) for each of the six events/motions.] The conflict pairings for all six are either Coris and/or Doris versus OFU, Inc. and/or Jett Setter. [The consistent overall objectives are to obtain damages on one side and to avoid liability on the other. However, given that this is a civil procedure exam, the earhart questions, objectives that count for purposes of generating premises are intermediate in nature. In the larger (intermediate) sense they are to keep the litigation going versus termination on a procedural ground.
More immediate to the six events/motions:] 1 = Change venue to Queens County vs. keep it in Manhattan County. 2 = Establish personal jurisdiction vs. not. 3 = Have lack of personal jurisdiction defense ruled moot vs. Quellenangabe. exists and essay viable. 4 = Preclude disclosure of quellenangabe, overheard conversation vs. have it ruled discoverable. 5 = Have fact admitted vs. not admitted. 6 = Have claim heard in small claims court vs. dismissed. [My view at this point is that each event/motion will generate no more than one or two premises, and will be relatively straightforward of amelia earhart, analysis. Therefore, the time to be allotted each will be roughly the same. Conclusion. As it would interrupt continuity of train of questions, thought and be time wasting to continue applying the Steps to all six, from essay, this point on earhart questions, I shall work on each question to completion before going on to the next .] Step Two €” [Consider each pairing, party, and objective.
Cull facts (and course outline) for relevant premises.] 1 = Venue of short essay war, transitory action is overriding , (i.e., governs the determination, no matter which party's perspective/objective is considered. See definition of Step Two and footnote, page 104.) 2 = Nail and mail service vs. due diligence rule. [Complete analysis/discussion of No.2 (7-8 minutes??), then on earhart essay, to No.3; . . Quellenangabe. . No.4; . . . 5; . . . 6.] 3 = Rule re lack of personal jurisdiction and grounds for waiver thereof overrides. 4 = Rule re discovery of spousal communication overrides.
5 = Requests for amelia earhart admission, and failure to essay quellenangabe respond thereto overrides. 6 = Res judicata rules override. Step Three €” [Consider each premise to note missing elements or real issues.] [Since there appear to be but one or two premises to be considered for each event/motion, and since I am working on each exclusive of the others, Step Three is unnecessary as an independent exercise. It is part and parcel of earhart, inspecting the law giving rise to the premise under consideration to essay miller determine whether it is necessary to state all of the law to essay begin the first paragraph of on arthur miller, analysis, or whether one or more elements can be focused on as pivotal.] Preview of a logical sequence for discussion €” No overlap of discussion apparent. No reason apparent not to proceed in the chronology given. [When question(s)/instruction(s) offer a labeling format, you of amelia questions, course normally use it. The professor/bar grader will likely be looking for persuasive on smoking it (Here -- 1,2,3, etc. It seems unnecessary, time wasting, and probably confusing to mention conflict pairings here. Amelia Earhart Questions. However, I am thinking of and guided by quellenangabe them.]
Generally, unless compelling reasons exist to direct otherwise, a transitory action [flag relevant law with underlining or boldface] should be tried in the county where the action arose. Transitory has been defined to mean that the transaction that is the subject of the action could have occurred anywhere. Coris' fall and amelia earhart essay questions the destruction of the quellenangabe, racquet could have occurred anywhere. [Concludes statement of relevant premise, i.e., controlling legal precept, that abruptly begins every paragraph.] Moreover, Coris, Only For Us, Inc. (OFU), and Jett Setter all reside in Queens County. The residence in New York County of Coris' mother, Doris, whose claim is amelia questions, minor, is the only apparent reason for trying the action in New York County. It is essay on arthur, hardly compelling. [Concludes lawyerlike analysis -- application of law to relevant facts.] Conclusion : The motion should be granted. [No hedging, as this seems open and shut.] So-called nail and mail service will satisfy the requirements of personal jurisdiction only where personal service on a defendant cannot be effected through due diligence. [Law.] It has been held that three attempts at in hand service at a defendant's place of business, without attempting to serve the defendant at home or leave the summons and complaint with a person of suitable age and discretion at the place of business does not satisfy the amelia essay, requirements of in thesis writing, due diligence. Plaintiffs made no attempt to serve defendant Setter personally other than twice unsuccessfully at essay questions, his place of business. Persuasive Conclusion. [Analysis.]
Conclusion: The attempted nail and mail service was likely [Hedging!] ineffective for lack of amelia questions, due diligence. Where a defendant who has not been properly served nevertheless appears in an action, answers the complaint, and interposes affirmative defenses, but never moves to dismiss for lack of notes essay, personal jurisdiction, nor at any time claims lack of personal jurisdiction, the defense of lack of earhart, personal jurisdiction will be deemed waived upon the taking of an appeal. [Law.] Setter, as concluded above, was never properly served. Nevertheless, he appeared, answered the complaint, defended in essay, the action, and at no time prior to appeal claimed lack of personal jurisdiction. Arguably, raising the claim on essay questions, appeal is after trial. However, waived upon the taking of an essay, appeal clearly indicates that the time for raising the claim would be deemed tolled. [Analysis.] Conclusion : Setter's defense of lack of amelia earhart questions, personal jurisdiction would be deemed waived on appeal. Generally, all information that is not privileged and is relevant to the subject matter of the action is discoverable, even if not admissible as proof. Confidential communications between husband and wife are privileged from introduction for the menagerie, disclosure by either spouse and by a third party (e.g., an eavesdropper). [Law.] Coris' statement that she had smashed the racquet was relevant for its truth, as well as an indication of Coris' truthfulness.
Confidential normally implies private or secret. [Add clarification, or law, where needed, and appropriate.] A conversation at a phone that was apparently near other phones would not seem confidential. Moreover, given that Coris had not yet determined to sue, her statement in the context of remarks about dinner and amelia questions a hot tub seems merely casual. [Analysis.] Conclusion : The motion will fail. The conversation with the husband was not confidential, and therefore not privileged. A request for an admission imposes a duty on the party served to acknowledge the existence of in thesis writing, facts that are not in doubt and that should not be necessary to prove at trial. However, inter alia, it is not proper to request an admission to an abstract statement of amelia earhart questions, law (e.g., that allowing a minor without a license to drive is negligent, per se). The statement in question seems manifestly a matter that is in some doubt, and that may be necessary to prove at trial. Short Essay Civil. Moreover, in that negligence is a legal conclusion, the statement would appear to be an abstract statement of law. Conclusion : Doris' disregard of the request is of no consequence, as said request imposed no duty of acknowledgment. A final judgment on the merits of a claim or cause of action generally precludes reassertion of that claim or cause of action in a subsequent suit. Doris' action in small claims court is grounded in the same facts (destroyed tennis racquet) and sets forth the same cause of action as the one dismissed in the primary action herein.
A directed verdict during trial seems both a final judgment and a judgment on the merits. Conclusion : The action in small claims court would be dismissed as res judicata. Corporations Hypothetical (50 min.) The RIP Corporation, formed in 1998 by earhart the Bottomline brothers, Ohmy, Padthe, and Savethe, for the purpose (as duly set forth in its bylaws and articles of incorporation) of manufacturing and retailing so-called landscape rape accessories for four wheel drive and introduction menagerie essay other off-the-road vehicles, quickly prospered and went public. Between 1999, when 100,000 shares were first sold over the counter, and 2001 the amelia earhart questions, total value of menagerie, RIPCORP (as the enterprise was affectionately known) shares, after two splits, rose tenfold to forty million dollars. Flush with their success and invincible in their avarice, the Bottomline brothers led RIPCORP in the aggressive pursuit of amelia earhart questions, profit wherever it might be found. The brothers held the chief executive positions in the corporation, as well as a majority of seats on the board of directors. They further owned thirty percent of the outstanding shares, by far the largest voting block. Thus, acquiescence in their increasingly bold ventures was virtually assured. Matters began to tangle when Meddle, a shareholder of record since purchasing 100 shares at the initial offering, took umbrage at RIPCORP's proposed acquisition of persuasive conclusion, Southeast Asia ski resort options.
In the fall of 2001 Meddle sought permission to inspect the RIPCORP minutes and earhart essay other records relating to scandal the ski resort venture. When she refused to accede to amelia earhart questions the demand of the Bottomline brothers that she first divulge her intentions regarding the inspection, the for the glass menagerie, brothers issued a directive limiting access to the books and earhart essay records to persons cleared by quellenangabe them, and under no circumstances to Meddle or her representative. Thereupon Meddle brought suit in earhart, her own right and on behalf of RIPCORP against the corporation and essay the crucible the Bottomline brothers personally to gain access to the books and records, to block the earhart essay, ski resort venture as an ultra vires act, and for repayment by essay civil war the RIPCORP board of directors of amelia essay, any expenses incurred in connection with the pursuit of said venture. 1) RIPCORP moved to dismiss the action for, inter alia, lack of standing, failure to first make a demand on the board of directors, and failure to state a cause of action. 2) RIPCORP moved in the alternative that the court require Meddle to post $25,000 security for costs as a precondition to continued maintenance of the suit. Persuasive On Smoking Conclusion. 3) Meanwhile, the RIPCORP board passed a resolution providing for indemnification of the directors in the event Meddle prevailed, and purchased insurance to provide for same. Meddle immediately moved to quash these actions. How should the court decide the motions under 1, 2, and 3 above?
RELEVANT LEGAL PRINCIPLES FOR CORPORATIONS HYPO. Ultra vires acts €” Generally includes acts beyond the amelia earhart questions, purpose or powers of the corporation, and sometimes includes acts within the notes on a scandal, purposes and powers of the corporation, but performed in an unauthorized manner or without authority. Many jurisdictions now restrict ultra vires challenges to the following: 1) the right of a shareholder to enjoin unauthorized corporate acts; 2) the right of the attorney general of the state to enjoin such activities; 3) the right of the amelia earhart essay, corporation to essay quellenangabe recover damages from the officers and/or directors (present or former) responsible for the ultra vires act(s). Essay. Shareholder inspection rights €” Generally, shareholders have a limited right, founded in common law and statute, to inspect corporate books and essay the crucible records which are relevant to a proper purpose. Courts will determine whether a purpose is proper. A shareholder may examine the stock book and minutes of stockholder meetings on earhart questions, demand if 1) he has been a stockholder of record for at least six months immediately preceding the demand; or 2) he is a holder of 5 percent of any class of outstanding shares. Shareholder rights of action €” Generally, a shareholder may sue the corporation in his own name to enforce his rights as a shareholder, and/or on behalf of the corporation to procure a judgment in short, favor of the corporation. The latter derivative action may be maintained only if 1) the plaintiff is a shareholder when the action is brought; 2) the plaintiff was a shareholder when the essay, alleged wrong to the corporation occurred; and 3) the notes, plaintiff shows in amelia, his complaint that he has demanded that the board of directors commence the action, or that there are sufficient reasons for not making the demand (e.g., the board members are the defendants).
Note that in order to minimize the possibility of derivative actions without merit being brought merely for nuisance value settlements or counsel fee awards, the for the glass essay, corporation may require the amelia questions, plaintiff to post security for costs, unless 1) the plaintiff or plaintiffs hold at least 5 percent of any class of outstanding shares; or 2) the value of their shares exceeds $50,000. Indemnification €” Generally, a director or officer may not be indemnified (reimbursed) against a judgment obtained against him in a direct action by glass the corporation, or a derivative action on earhart questions, behalf of the corporation, or for amounts paid in settlement thereof. The director may, however, be indemnified against expenses of defending the action, unless, inter alia, he is adjudged to have violated his fiduciary duty of good faith and reasonable care in the circumstances. The corporation may purchase insurance to what in thesis writing indemnify officers and directors for even the above judgments, providing no deliberate dishonesty or unlawful gain on the part of the officer/director is shown. MODEL RESPONSE TO CORPORATIONS HYPOTHETICAL. Preliminary Overview €” The three motions referred to by the question are like three questions, each to be considered separately. [Note the enormous benefit here of skipping over the facts.] Step One €” Conflict pairing(s) : [A quick review of the amelia earhart essay questions, motions in conjunction with the sentence that precedes them reveals the single conflict pairing throughout.] RIPCORP, Inc. v. Meddle, etc., or vice versa for each motion (i.e., question). Objectives : [Somewhat confusing, as the sentence immediately preceding the motions reflects three ultimate objectives of for the menagerie essay, Meddle.
However, the objectives relevant to a Step One analysis and amelia earhart essay the question are implied in the three motions. Note that motion #1 also provides Movant RIPCORP's premises (!!). Whether the ultimate objectives will be achieved depends upon resolution of the motions.] 1) dismiss the action versus keep it going; 2) $25,000 security be required to be posted, versus not; 3) board indemnification resolution and purchase of insurance be quashed, versus maintenance of same. Step Two €” [RIPCORP is movant for motions 1 and 2, Meddle for 3. The motions themselves, especially the notes scandal essay, first, point to amelia overriding premises.
In that a court may dismiss all or part of a suit, each premise must be considered in light of quellenangabe, each of earhart, Meddle's objectives set forth in the preceding sentence . The facts in essay on smoking conclusion, the first two paragraphs need only be considered for purposes of amelia questions, analysis.] 1) Lack of standing, failure to first make a demand on the board, and failure to state a cause of action respecting each of Meddle's three objectives = potentially nine discussions. but probably not. 2) [Must refer to relevant portions of persuasive on smoking conclusion, corporations toolbox.] The law [Noted in toolbox only. Don't write it in your outline.] respecting requirement that a shareholder plaintiff in action against corporation post bond. 3) The law respecting indemnification and/or insurance of directors in amelia questions, such a suit. Step Three €” [The motions seem more or less equivalent in weight. Given the introduction essay, complexity of the relevant premises noted in Step Two, the effort necessary for a Step Three analysis seems needlessly duplicative of the analysis to be performed in writing the actual response. Therefore, it seems advisable to skip Step Three and go to the writing phase .] Preview of a logical sequence for discussion €” No reason apparent for earhart essay questions not proceeding chronologically. Lack of standing/failure to state a cause of action. Generally, a shareholder may sue the corporation in her own name to essay war enforce her rights as a shareholder, and/or on behalf of the corporation to earhart essay procure a judgment in favor of the corporation.
Inter alia, the conclusion, latter derivative action can be maintained only if the plaintiff is a shareholder when the action is brought and when the alleged wrong to the corporation occurred. Meddle (M) is currently a shareholder, and has been since long before the ski resort venture. Generally, shareholders have a limited right, founded in common law and statute, to earhart essay inspect corporate books and essay records which are relevant to a proper purpose. Courts will determine whether a purpose is proper. A shareholder may examine the essay questions, stock book and minutes of persuasive essay on smoking conclusion, stockholder meetings on demand if she has been a stockholder of earhart, record for at least six months immediately preceding the demand; or she is a holder of introduction glass menagerie, five percent of any class of outstanding shares. Earhart Essay. M's 100 shares, presumably grown after 'two splits to 400, constitutes much less than five percent of any class of shares. However, she has been a stockholder of record since the initial offering, over two years prior. So-called ultra vires acts €” acts beyond the purposes or powers of the corporation, and is methodology in thesis writing sometimes acts within the purposes and powers of the corporation, but performed in an unauthorized manner or without authority may properly be challenged by shareholders.
Moreover, the amelia essay, corporation may recover damages from the officers and/or directors (present and in thesis writing former) responsible for amelia earhart the ultra vires act(s) . Given that RIPCORP's stated corporate purpose is to manufacture and essay quellenangabe retail accessories for off-road vehicles, the Southeast Asian ski venture (Venture) has the essay questions, appearance of an ultra vires act for which damages may be sought. Failure to first make a demand on in thesis writing, the board. Another requirement for amelia essay maintaining a derivative action is that the plaintiff demand that the board commence the action, or there be sufficient reasons for not making such demand (e.g., the board members are the defendants). The Bottomline brothers are named in M's suit and hold a majority of seats on the board, thereby satisfying the exception. Conclusion : The motion should be denied, as all of RIPCORP's challenges lack merit. Corporations, in order to minimize the possibility of derivative actions without merit being brought merely for nuisance value settlements or counsel fee awards, may require a shareholder plaintiff to post security for costs , unless the essay, plaintiff or plaintiffs hold at least five percent of amelia earhart questions, any class of outstanding shares, or the value of glass, their shares exceeds $50,000. M's 100 shares constituted but 1/10th of one percent of the initial 100,000 share offering. Their value at the time of the suit would have been 1/10th of one percent of amelia essay, forty million dollars, or approximately $40,000.
However, M has been a shareholder since the very beginning of the corporation, and, as set forth, supra , a challenge to the Venture seems hardly without merit. [Yes, basic math may be necessary!] Conclusion : Although M falls $10,000 short of the $50,000 exception, the short essay, motion should probably be denied. Given that M's sharehold nearly satisfies the exception, and amelia earhart essay questions the policy justification underlying the security requirement seems utterly lacking, it is unlikely that a court would permit the corporation to impose this financial impediment. Introduction For The Menagerie Essay. [Note the use of the policy underpinning as a basis for a counterargument.] Generally, a corporate director (or officer) may not be indemnified against a judgment obtained against him in a direct action by the corporation or a derivative action, or for amounts paid in settlement thereof. The director may, however, be indemnified against amelia earhart essay, expenses of defending the action, unless, inter alia, he is adjudged to essay civil have violated his fiduciary duty of good faith and reasonable care in the circumstances. The corporation may purchase insurance to indemnify officers and directors for even the above judgments, providing no deliberate dishonesty or unlawful gain on the part of the officer/director is amelia earhart essay questions, shown.
[Given this much legal preamble, it seems appropriate to begin the analysis in notes on a essay, a new paragraph.] M's action is in earhart, part derivative on behalf of RIPCORP, and a judgment obtained in this respect cannot be indemnified against. The facts are unclear about whether the resolution indemnifies against expenses of defending against the action. Assuming, arguendo , that it does, the inherent improbability, indeed inherent folly of the Venture, coupled with its seeming obvious ultra vires aspect, strongly suggests a violation by the directors of their duty to exercise reasonable care, if not a violation of quellenangabe, their duty to act in good faith. However, given that RIPCORP appears to have been engaged for some time in a pattern of divers schemes wholly unrelated to its stated purpose, it is unlikely that a court would be willing to take judicial notice of such a conclusion so early in the proceedings. Nothing in the facts suggests deliberate dishonesty or unlawful gain on the part of any RIPCORP director/officer that would preclude the purchase of indemnification insurance. Conclusion : The motion should be granted as to essay any portion of the notes on a scandal essay, resolution that purports to indemnify against essay, judgments obtained on the crucible, behalf of the corporation, denied as to portions that indemnify against judgments obtained by M, and denied with leave to amelia essay renew at a later time with respect to all other portions.
T properly executed a will in 1994, by the terms of which he distributed his entire estate in on smoking conclusion, the following manner: First: I bequeath my racehorse, Swayback, to amelia questions my friend, X. Second: I bequeath $100,000 to my brother, Y. Third: I give, devise, and bequeath the rest, residue, and remainder of my estate to on arthur the crucible my faithful companion, Z. In 1998, having fallen out with Z, T properly executed a new will with the following terms: First: I bequeath $100,000 to my brother, Y. Second: I give, devise, and bequeath the rest, residue, and remainder of my estate to my (new) faithful companion, B. In 1999, having reconciled with Z and essay spurned B, T properly executed a codicil to his 1994 will, by the terms of which he increased the what in thesis writing, legacy to Y to $150,000; and in all other respects he ratified, confirmed, and amelia questions republished the 1994 will.
T died in introduction menagerie essay, 2001. In a probate proceeding the evidence established the amelia questions, following: 1) Although sober when he made the codicil in 1999, T was drunk out of his mind when he executed the 1994 will. 2) T sold Swayback to a syndicate in 1997 for $200,000. 3) Inadvertently in 2000 T, falling asleep at his desk with cigarette in hand, set fire to some papers. One of the papers destroyed was the original copy of the essay conclusion, 1999 codicil, which T had been reviewing. 4) Y died in 2000. 5) S, the son of Y, was one of several witnesses to T's execution of the 1994 will. Discuss the rights of the various parties in terms of who takes what from T's estate. RELEVANT LEGAL PRINCIPLES FOR WILLS HYPOTHETICAL.
Ademption €” Occurs when a specific legacy (defined below) is not in existence or not in the possession of the testator when he dies (because, for example, it has been sold or given away). When an ademption occurs, the legatee takes nothing. Death of a beneficiary €” A disposition to a beneficiary who predeceases the testator ordinarily lapses (returns to the estate). By statute in many jurisdictions, however, dispositions to beneficiaries who are issue or siblings do not lapse, providing such beneficiaries have surviving issue. Questions. Such surviving issue will take the legacy in civil war, equal proportions per stirpes . Disposition of estate €” Shall be in accordance with a decedent's last will and testament.
Execution of a will €” A properly executed will implies at least two witnesses thereto who do not stand to take under said will. Republication €” A properly executed codicil to amelia a revoked will operates as a republication of a will that is, in form, properly executed. This is so despite the fact that the will so republished may have been invalid for want of testamentary capacity at the time of making. Revocation €” As a general rule, a subsequent will that is entirely inconsistent with a prior will, or a later will that makes a complete disposition of the testator's property, shall be deemed to short essay war have revoked the prior will by implication. A will may further be revoked by means of its physical destruction. Such destruction, however, must be accompanied with the intent and for amelia earhart questions the purpose of revoking the essay, will.
Specific legacy €” A bequest of essay questions, a particular, individualized chattel, differentiated from writing, all other articles of the same or similar nature. It must be taken by the legatee as and where he finds it. Testamentary capacity €” Absent evidence to the contrary, testamentary capacity will be presumed where the testator, in executing a will or other document, accurately recites the nature and extent of his property, and amelia earhart questions recognizes the notes scandal essay, natural objects of essay, his bounty. Witness as beneficiary €” A witness to quellenangabe a will may take under that will, providing said will can be proved in probate without his assistance. MODEL RESPONSE TO WILLS HYPOTHETICAL. Preliminary Overview €” The instruction points to parties who stand to take from essay, T's estate. Each will be in opposition to anyone or anything that would prevent him from taking from notes scandal, T's estate. Step One €” X, Y, Z, B, and A vs. anyone or thing (including each other, T, the state, or the estate) that stands between him and taking from T's estate. B v. Z seems a key conflict.
Step Two €” [Each claimant must establish that the will or codicil upon which he bases his claim is valid and controlling. Each will likewise seek to defeat a competitor claim. Legal precepts governing testamentary disposition set forth in my wills toolbox will come into play. However, it would be inefficient and confusing to try to sort them out at this point. Earhart Essay. Better to focus on one conflict at a time in the writing phase. Possibly there will be overlap of premises/discussion.] Step Three €” [Having declined to set forth the premises of the is methodology, various parties in essay questions, Step Two, I may as well go straight to the response. My impression is that once the controlling rules are set forth, analysis will be relatively uncomplicated.] Ability of a per stirpes witness, S, to take may be an interesting discussion. Preview of a logical sequence of discussion €” Resolving which instrument controls seems the introduction, obvious first step. Therefore, beginning with B v. Amelia Earhart Questions. Z would seem to make sense.
B and short war Z's rights [This label conforms to the instruction. B v. Z might confuse. But I'm thinking B v. Z!] As a general rule, a subsequent will that is entirely inconsistent with a prior will, or a later will that makes a complete disposition of the testator's property, shall be deemed to have revoked the prior willby implication. Amelia Questions. The 1998 will was inconsistent with the 1994 will and made a complete disposition of T's property, thereby revoking the 1994 will and Z's legacy. However, a properly executed codicil to a revoked will operates as a republication of a will that is, in form, properly executed. This is so despite the fact that the will so republished may have been invalid for want of testamentary capacity at the time of making.
The properly executed 1999 codicil republished the properly executed 1994 will, thereby restoring Z's legacy. The fact that T was sober when making the codicil moots any effect of T having been drunk when making the 1994 will. Conclusion. There being no evidence to the contrary, the amelia earhart, fact that T in executing the codicil accurately recited the nature and extent of his property and recognized the natural objects of his bounty will establish his testamentary capacity in making the codicil. Although a will may be revoked by means of physical destruction , such destruction must be accomplished with the intent and for the purpose of revoking the civil war, will. The circumstance that the original copy of the codicil was destroyed inadvertently in amelia questions, 2000 is thus of no avail to B. Conclusion : The 1998 will is revoked, and B takes nothing. Essay On Smoking. Z takes the rest, residue, and remainder of T's estate under the 1999 codicil that revived the 1994 will. An ademption occurs when a specific legacy (i.e., a bequest of a particular, individualized chattel, differentiated from all other articles of the same or similar nature) is earhart questions, not in writing, existence or not in the possession of the testator when he dies. When an ademption occurs, the legatee takes nothing. The racehorse, Swayback, appears to be such a particular, individualized chattel.
In that Swayback was sold prior to T's death, the republication of the 1994 will is of no avail to X. Conclusion : X takes nothing from T's estate, as his legacy has adeemed. A disposition to a beneficiary who predeceases the amelia earhart essay questions, testator ordinarily lapses. By statute in many jurisdictions, however, dispositions to on a beneficiaries who are issue or siblings do not lapse, providing such beneficiaries have surviving issue. Such surviving issue will take the legacy in equal proportions per stirpes . Therefore, although Y predeceased T, Y's son, S, would take the $150,000, providing he is not disqualified by having witnessed the now republished 1994 will.
A witness to a will may take under that will, providing said will can be proved in probate without his assistance. A properly executed will implies at least two witnesses thereto who do not stand to take under said will. Essay. S was one of on arthur, several witnesses to the 1994 will, implying that more than two persons witnessed the will. Therefore, presumably two other witnesses exist to prove the essay questions, will in probate. NB: Arguably S should be permitted to take under the 1994 will per stirpes, even were he one of only two witnesses to the will. On Smoking. The rationale for essay not allowing a witness necessary to probate to take under the will being probated is presumably the conflict of interest posed. The reliability of a witness with a vested interest in essay quellenangabe, having the will probated is compromised. Y, however, not S stood to amelia take under the 1994 will.
Had there been any consideration of Y predeceasing T, and therefore S taking, S probably would not have been asked to witness the will. However, it could also be contended that that was then, and now S does have a compromising vested interest. [This latter paragraph is not necessary. Introduction Menagerie Essay. However, it demonstrates the kind of earhart, interest and thoughtfulness that may catch a professor's attention and garner an A. Possibly it should be highlighted in some way, perhaps with a red star. I might even decide to put it on the blank page left at the beginning. In Thesis Writing. (See p.75.)] Conclusion : Y, having predeceased T, will take nothing. However, Y's intended legacy will go to the son, S, per stirpes . S's having witnessed the earhart essay, will under which he takes should not disqualify him, providing two others of the several witnesses to the will exist to prove it in probate. Actual Civil Procedure I Exam, Fall 2006, U. Essay Quellenangabe. Memphis School of Law (with Model A+ Response and Professor Comments) [The example that follows is an amelia earhart, actual exam and model response sent to us by one Richard Townley, Sr., U. Memphis class of 2009E (evening division).
The exam was given jointly to two first year classes by introduction for the essay their professors. Richard ordered the audio CD version of LEEWS. His is the essay questions, verbatim model response offered to students — with professor comments! — as what was wanted. His response received the highest grade, one of only two A+ grades. His accompanying remarks are reprinted in essay the crucible, the Results section. Inter alia (among other things), he said, LEEWS was absolutely essential to amelia essay my success. . The exemplar is, in fact, *my* exam essay answer, and what is methodology in thesis if I say so myself, it's a pretty good LEEWS exemplar as well.
We reiterate that the LEEWS objective for every response is a series of paragraphs, each beginning with relevant law and presenting balanced lawyerlike analysis. . What is surely wanted when confronted with a task such as what follows is a system whereby in essay questions, structured, step-by-step fashion, the examinee knows exactly what is wanted and how to proceed and present. For example, a LEEWS grad will immediately skip over the confusing fact pattern to the question/instruction, typically at the end, and perform Step One. Persuasive Essay On Smoking. A LEEWS grad has also read many such introductory instructions, and therefore will skim through quickly to note what, if anything, is new and/or unusual. Note that the average student managed less than 17 points out of a possible 45 on the essay exam versus Richard's 39 (!!). Amelia Questions. . It may be further noted that although these professors did not require a so-called IRAC format [and we commend that!), Richard's paragraphed response could easily have been conformed to a Follow IRAC instruction by merely introducing an issue statement before each paragraph, and a conclusion statement at the end. LEEWS posits that in general issue statements are unnecessary, as starting a paragraph with law implies the issue, and conclusions are unimportant.]
Civil Procedure I -- Exam Results -- Fall, 2006 (§ 11 = Prof Banks, § 12 = Prof Entman) Essays - 45 points. Average -- § 11 [17.2]; § 12 [16.1]; both sections [16.6] Range -- § 11 [3 - 42]; § 12 [4 - 39] Multiple Choice - 55 points (35 questions) Average -- § 11 [33.70]; § 12 [35.00]; both sections [34.36] Range -- § 11 [18.86 - 50.29]; § 12 [17.29 - 53.43] Total - 100 points. Average -- § 11 [50.90]; § 12 [51.09]; both sections [50.99] Range -- § 11 [22.86 - 92.29]; § 12 [26.29 - 83.00]
Average Grade - § 11 [2.33] Both Sections [2.34] § 12 [2.34] A+: 82 and above. F : 0 - 32. INSTRUCTIONS - Read these instructions carefully. Quellenangabe. You are responsible for questions following them to essay on arthur miller the crucible the letter and amelia earhart will be assessed a point penalty or given a failing grade for civil failure to follow instructions. Before you begin work on essay questions, this examination, be sure that you have an examination booklet consisting of quellenangabe, 8 consecutively numbered pages -- beginning with this page. Part I consists of problems calling for written analysis.
Part II consists of 35 multiple choice questions. Amelia Questions. If your examination is incomplete, you should advise the instructor immediately. It is notes, your responsibility to ensure that you are working with a complete examination. The exam is closed book. You may not use any material other than this examination booklet, the answer sheet, blank paper and an appropriate writing instrument. You may not, of course, confer with or receive assistance from any other person. Your answers for Part I should be written on the paper provided.
Be sure to identify clearly which subpart you are answering (e.g., I. A.). When you have completed your answers to Part I, number your pages consecutively, write your identification number on each page, and staple all of the pages together in the upper left hand corner. 1. Answer only the question asked and do so with organization, precision, legibility, and proper grammar and spelling. 2. If a court rule or a statute is relevant to a problem, you may identify it by number, but you must discuss its substance whether or not you mention the rule or statute by number. 3. Amelia Earhart Essay Questions. Write on civil war, only one side of a page and leave a left margin. Write your identification number in the space provided on the answer sheet for Part II and mark the appropriate corresponding circles on your answer sheet to indicate your examination number. Questions. Do not staple the answer sheet for Part II to anything. Submission of Exams -- General Instructions When you have finished the examination, place your answers to Part I, your answer sheet for Part II, and notes on a essay the exam booklet in the separately designated boxes. All examination booklets must be turned in. You must write your identification number on this exam booklet at questions, the top of the first page and return the booklet in order that your exam answer sheet may be matched with the on a scandal essay, correct version of the answers. Do not write your name on anything.
For this examination, unless we have specifically studied to the contrary, you should assume the following: 1. all states have adopted rules of civil procedure identical to earhart essay the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; 2. all states have enacted statutes that authorize the exercise of jurisdiction on each of the traditional bases recognized by the Supreme Court up to the date of its decision in International Shoe; 3. Notes On A Scandal. all states have also enacted the following statutes: X.C.A. § 1-1-111: A court may exercise personal jurisdiction over a person (including an individual, his executor, administrator, or other personal representative, or a corporation, partnership, or any other legal or commercial entity) who acts directly or by an agent, as to a claim for amelia questions relief arising from the person€™s. (a) transacting any business within this State; (b) causing tortious injury by an act or omission in this State; (c) causing tortious injury in essay quellenangabe, this State by an act or omission outside this State if the person regularly does or solicits business, or engages in any other persistent course of conduct, or derives substantial revenue from goods used or consumed or services rendered in this State; (d) owning, using or possessing any property situated in this State; (e) contracting to insure any person, property, or risk located within this State at the time of contracting.
X.C.A. § 2-2-222: In any suit brought in amelia earhart essay questions, the courts of this State, service of process may be achieved by sending a summons and a copy of the complaint by registered mail, return receipt requested, to the defendant's home address, or principal place of business, wherever located. The problems in Part I are worth a total of 45 points. They are not of equal weight. A. You are now an associate attorney in essay quellenangabe, a law firm. Respond fully to the following memorandum from one of your employers. €śI Quit€ť is not a recommended answer. To: Associate. Re: First Commercial Industrial Bank v. Amelia Earhart Essay. Isolde.
Date: Dec. 11, 2006. [Fact pattern (hypo)] Tristan and Isolde are partners in a furniture repair business. Their shop is in the State of on smoking, Swabia where most of their customers are from. Sometimes people from the nearby States of Prussia and Bavaria bring repair jobs to the shop in Swabia. Isolde was raised in Prussia and amelia essay questions lived there with her parents until June, 2003, when she moved into an apartment in notes on a, Swabia to see if she would enjoy living away from home.
In July, 2003, a vice-president of First Commercial Industrial Bank of questions, Prussia [€śFirst Commercial€ť] attended a lecture on furniture repair that Isolde gave in Prussia. He decided that Tristan and Isolde had a promising business and on a scandal essay that the bank would do well to procure their business. After receiving a letter at their shop offering the bank€™s services, Tristan and amelia essay Isolde decided to for the glass essay borrow $150,000 from First Commercial. By telephone, they requested the bank send them the paperwork at essay, their shop. On August 15, 2003, Tristan and Isolde signed the loan papers at their shop and Tristan immediately took them to First Commercial€™s main office, located ten miles away in the State of Prussia.
First Commercial then gave them a check for $150,000 minus closing costs of approximately $5,000. The loan agreement provided that its interpretation and validity would be governed by the law of Prussia and that it was to be repaid in two years. Due to financial difficulties, Tristan and is methodology Isolde made only two payments on earhart, the loan. When First Commercial threatened to sue them, Tristan settled the bank€™s claim against him for $50,000. First Commercial then sued Isolde in what is methodology in thesis, the United States District Court for Prussia to collect the unpaid principal and interest. First Commercial€™s attorney served Isolde with process by amelia essay questions registered mail, return receipt requested, to her at the shop in Swabia. On May 15, 2005, after Isolde failed to respond to the complaint and summons, the court entered a default judgment against her for $100,000. On December 1, 2006, First Commercial sought to register the persuasive, judgment against amelia earhart essay questions, Isolde with the notes on a scandal essay, United States District Court for the District of Swabia. In conjunction that proceeding, First Commercial procured a writ of garnishment, attaching $10,000 that Isolde had in a bank account in Swabia. First Commercial also procured a writ of garnishment from the federal court in Bavaria, attaching a $5,000 debt owed to Isolde by amelia earhart essay one of her customers there. [Question/instruction] We represent Isolde.
Please submit a memo to short me discussing fully whether Isolde has any defenses she may raise to the enforcement proceedings in Swabia and Bavaria. Be sure to discuss fully any possible defenses that you may have considered and rejected and explain fully why you have rejected them. B. The next day, you receive the following memorandum from the amelia essay, same partner. Again, respond fully. To: Associate. Re: First Commercial Industrial Bank v. Short. Isolde.
Date: Dec. 12, 2006. I have now learned that Isolde was involved in an automobile accident in Swabia a week after she was served with process by registered mail. She was rendered unconscious for essay questions two days. An ambulance rushed her to the nearest hospital, which was located in essay war, Prussia. Three days after the accident, but while she was hospitalized in Prussia, a private process server acting on behalf of First Commercial served Isolde in her hospital bed with a another copy of the summons and complaint for the same lawsuit. Given that she was served while in the state, it now seems to me that the amelia earhart, judgment of the federal district court in Prussia against persuasive essay conclusion, Isolde is unquestionably valid and is enforceable in both Swabia and amelia earhart essay Bavaria. Please discuss fully whether you believe that assumption is what in thesis, valid and whether the service on Isolde in the hospital establishes jurisdiction.
The discussion below is a verbatim copy of a student€™s essay that received a top grade. Commentary by Professors Banks and Entman appears in brackets. Amelia Questions. . [LEEWS note: We reprint this commentary in blue.] LEEWS NOTE: “IRAC” (merely a formula for essay organizing analysis of an issue) prescribes a statement of I ssue to precede the statement of R ule, and amelia essay questions the discussion ( A nalysis). (And C onclusion at the end.) The LEEWS paragraphing format posits that an quellenangabe, abrupt statement of premise (relevant law) to begin a paragraph implies the issue, making a separate statement of issue unnecessary (thereby saving time). Richard's model response in LEEWS format does this. Our only suggestion is amelia earhart essay, that underlining or boldfacing key words in the preamble of law — e.g., Subject matter jurisdiction in the opening paragraph, federal diversity statute in what in thesis, the next — to assist the professor in amelia earhart questions, recognizing the topic (issue). Subject-matter jurisdiction. The federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction; they can only hear certain types of claims as outlined in Article III of the US Constitution and as authorized by Congressional Statute. First Commercial will argue that the US District Court has subject-matter jurisdiction to hear this case based on the diversity of introduction menagerie essay, citizenship of the parties.
First Commercial is a citizen of Prussia. Isolde has been living in Swabia for one month. [The facts do not give sufficient information to amelia know how long Isolde had been living in Swabia at essay on arthur miller the crucible, the time First Commercial filed its complaint, which is the time at which jurisdiction must either exist or not. At most, one can deduce that the suit was brought as early as November 2003 or as late as April 2005. Consequently, Isolde must have been living in Swabia for more than one month, but not the two or three years that some students stated.] She can argue that she is still domiciled in Prussia, where she lived her whole life up to June of 2003, because she only moved to amelia Swabia temporarily, to see €śif she would enjoy€ť life on her own. If Isolde is found to on smoking be a domiciliary of earhart essay questions, Prussia, then there is not diversity of citizenship and thus no subject matter jurisdiction. However, if Isolde is found to have relocated to Swabia with the glass, intent of staying for the indefinite future, then the parties are diverse. The federal diversity statute also requires the earhart, amount in essay on arthur miller the crucible, controversy to exceed $75,000.
The $100,000 judgment against amelia essay, Isolde satisfies this requirement. N.B. [Please do not use abbreviations, including this one.] This action could not be brought under €śfederal question€ť jurisdiction because breach of contract is introduction for the glass essay, a state common-law claim. Therefore nothing in the plaintiff€™s complaint arises under the Constitution and laws of the United States. Subject-matter jurisdiction is never waived, and in this case, it has not been previously litigated, so it could be raised on essay questions, collateral attack. Scandal Essay. However, it is more likely than not that the court will find that Isolde did move to Swabia with the intent to stay indefinitely, so the District Court in Prussia probably did have subject-matter jurisdiction. Personal jurisdiction. In the essay, alternative, Isolde can argue that the the crucible, rendering court in Prussia lacked jurisdiction over the person.
Because this has not been litigated, it can be raised on collateral attack in amelia, the enforcing court. [We would have preferred a discussion at this point that specifically points out that Isolde never even appeared in the first action. Most of you could have improved your answers by making better use of the facts to support your analysis. The reason Isolde can raise personal jurisdiction on collateral attack is because she did not appear at all in the original action. Since she did not appear, there is no reason to discuss Rule 12.] First, Isolde will argue that there are no traditional bases for establishing jurisdiction over her in Prussia. N.B. The federal courts derive their personal jurisdictional reach from the state in which they are situated, so the District Court can exert personal jurisdiction over an out of state defendant only if the state court could do so.
Isolde was not served with process with Prussia, so transitory [transient?] jurisdiction does not attach. Because it is necessary that she be domiciled in essay quellenangabe, Swabia to establish diversity of citizenship, First Commercial cannot argue that she be subjected to personal jurisdiction on the basis of domicile. Even though the contract included a choice-of-law provision applying the laws of Prussia to possible disputes, that is amelia earhart questions, not the same as a consent provision. [A surprising number of notes on a essay, students referred to this as a forum selection clause. At least one student referred to it as a forum selection clause in part of the answer and a choice of law provision in another part of the same answer. Another specifically stated that it was a forum selection clause and not a choice of law provision.
Mistakes of this type may be attributable to sloppy reading of the facts but they are also a strong indication of a serious lack of preparation. Failure to devote sufficient time to study of the assigned materials frequently manifests itself in a person€™s demonstrated obliviousness to essay questions important distinctions. Others simply didn€™t know what to what writing do with the fact, thus reflecting a failure to study the Burger King opinion and to pay attention to our class discussions of it.] Statutory basis. First Commercial will argue that the long-arm statute conferred specific jurisdiction over Isolde on amelia questions, the basis of the first of the enumerated acts: €śa) transacting any business within the scandal essay, State.€ť The claim for relief, the $100,000 breach of contract, arises from the defendant€™s act of entering into amelia, the loan contract, which First Commercial will argue was executed on Tristan€™s delivery of the loan documents to on arthur miller the Bank€™s main office in Prussia. Isolde will counter that her act was signing the documents, which took place at the furniture shop in amelia earhart essay questions, Swabia. This is a valid argument so long as the court reads the statute literally and essay on smoking conclusion narrowly. Amelia Questions. However, if a court interpreted the statute broadly (See Gray v. American Radiator) it might find that the statute reaches the essay on arthur miller the crucible, out of state act, the signing of the contract, which causes an in state result, the execution of the contract. [It is probably not necessary to stretch the construction of the statute as the court did in amelia questions, Gray to hold that it confers jurisdiction, given the facts of this problem.
The statute covers transacting business in the forum state €śdirectly or by an agent.€ť Like McShara in Burger King, Tristan was acting on behalf of the partnership (thus as an agent) in introduction, delivering the papers to the bank. Amelia. The facts specifically state that Isolde, along with Tristan, signed the papers and that he immediately took them to the bank. You should never, as many of you did, overlook the statement that Isolde signed the papers or speculate that she may not have read them. There is simply no basis in the facts for speculating that Isolde didn€™t know what she was signing. Indulging in speculation that she might not have reveals desperation.]
Constitutional Standard. On Smoking Conclusion. The Fourteenth Amendment to the US Constitution provides that no state shall deprive a citizen of life, liberty or property without due process of questions, law. The U.S. Supreme Court defined the essay quellenangabe, due process standard as it relates to imposing personal jurisdiction on an out of essay questions, state defendant in notes on a scandal, International Shoe: jurisdiction is constitutional only essay if the cause of action arises from the defendant€™s minimum contacts with the forum, such that the notes, assertion of jurisdiction would not offend traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice. Assuming, arguendo, [LEEWS note: We teach the proper use of words like arguendo -- because they are useful and earhart questions add a lawyerly caste to the presentation.] that the what is methodology in thesis, long-arm statute is amelia earhart, sufficient to provide a statutory basis of jurisdiction over Isolde, would such jurisdiction be constitutional under the essay on arthur miller the crucible, Shoe standard? [While it is questions, implicit in the answer that the constitutional hurdle becomes important only if the court first accepts the argument that the statute confers jurisdiction, a perfect answer would have explained that relationship more fully.] Isolde will argue no, because the contact which gives rise to the claim, the signed loan contract, was brought into essay on arthur the crucible, the forum by amelia earhart the unilateral actions of glass menagerie essay, a third party, Tristan. Therefore, Isolde did not purposefully avail herself of the privileges of conducting activities in the forum, Prussia. Earhart Essay. First Commercial will counter that Tristan and Isolde were operating together to secure the loan.
They reached into miller the crucible, the forum when they called First Commercial. Isolde knew that Tristan was taking the documents to earhart essay questions Prussia, [run-on sentence, a sin committed by many students in these essays] therefore it was imminently [eminently] foreseeable that the contract would be executed there, and she could reasonably anticipate being haled into court in persuasive on smoking, Prussia over any disputes to the contract. (See Denckla, Worldwide VW). While there are some open questions regarding minimum contacts, the facts seem to favor First Commercial. In the amelia earhart, alternative, [In addition?] can Isolde raise any of the fairness factors, defining €śfair play and substantial justice,€ť articulated in the US Supreme Court€™s Burger King decision? In weighing the relative burden on Isolde compared to the interest of First National in litigating in Prussia, it does not seem unfair to require Isolde to travel to a nearby state where she lived most of her life and where she sometimes appears to give lectures. The interest of the forum state in adjudicating the dispute would be well served because of the choice of law provision; Prussia has an on arthur miller the crucible, interest in adjudicating its own laws. The interest of the several states in efficiency and public policy do not seem to enter the picture, so the fairness factors do not point to Prussia as an unfair forum for Isolde. Conclusion.
Although Isolde has some colorable arguments, she probably cannot invalidate the amelia essay questions, original judgment on a defense of lack of personal jurisdiction. [Many of introduction glass essay, you neglected altogether most of the issues about validity of the Prussia judgment treated in the foregoing answer, instead discussing at length personal jurisdiction, subject matter jurisdiction, and service of amelia earhart questions, process in the enforcement proceedings in Swabia and Bavaria. Such discussions reflect a lack of knowledge of our classwork on essay on smoking, Assignment 27, a failure to read the Shaffer v. Heitner opinion carefully, and a failure to study the amelia earhart questions, problems following that opinion in the casebook.]
Write My Paper -
Did Amelia Earhart survive a crash …
10 Things You Need to Know About Essay Castle Coursework Writing Service. For all those that are struggling with an unbearable amount of amelia questions coursework, we’ve got good news – you are not alone! Gone are the times when you had to deal with all kinds of courseworks on your own. We are here to help you, and our help is all you need to be able to essay on arthur the crucible manage college and other things you have in amelia earhart, life. What can we do for you? In simple words, we will do your coursework, no matter what it implies, without you having to lift a finger. EssayCastle.co.uk has a vast number of introduction for the menagerie essay writers at its disposal and their quills (or, more specifically, writing skills and amelia, time) are free for hire. We don’t expect you to plunge head first, however, and would like to tell you ten things you need to notes essay know about our service before you make your very first order. What you need to amelia know about our coursework help.
We are neither a resell service nor an online library. Papers written her, whatever the type, are created entirely from scratch. Once a paper has been submitted to the client, it is then deleted from the data base to prevent re-using. When you order coursework writing from our specialists, you are free to provide as many instructions as you deem necessary. Menagerie Essay! The ability to customize your order is one of the biggest benefits you will get at our service. Do you need an essay?
A research paper? A PhD thesis? No problem! Our service has been designed with all our customers’ needs in mind, so you will address our writing team with all kinds of requests. Urgency is often a major factor to choose an questions, appropriate writing company. We are glad to tell you that ours starts at only 3 hours. And even if your order is VERY urgent, it will be fulfilled and delivered right when you requested it to be fulfilled and delivered. While your order is being fulfilled, you have to options: to participate in fulfilment and keep tabs on essay civil war, paper development OR stay away from amelia, it entirely.
What you need to know about essay quellenangabe our UK coursework company. Once you become a customer of amelia essay this service, you will enjoy special discounts dedicated to holidays and other occasions. By using them, you can achieve significant savings and get the same high-quality papers. We have a few hundred of writers the short essay civil majority of whom are based in essay, the UK and have degrees from essay miller, major UK universities. The minimum required threshold is amelia earhart essay questions a master’s degree. With a wide span of subjects available, you can order English coursework or any other type of coursework you might possibly need. Introduction For The Menagerie Essay! We currently cover over amelia earhart questions, fifty subject areas and are adding more to short civil war cope with changing curricula. Amelia Earhart Essay Questions! It’s not the end of the world if you don’t like the paper you have received from us, and there is no need to try and improve it on your own. For situations like this, we have introduced a free-revision policy. After your paper has been written, you can request multiple free revisions.
The number of what is methodology writing revisions is not limited; however, we do limit the time to amelia 14 days. Last but not least, papers provided to notes our customers are ALWAYS original. Even though a medium originality level is universally accepted by writing services, we have a much higher standard and amelia questions, shoot for 100% originality. A plagiarism report is for the glass menagerie available for those who want to be sure about the amelia essay quality of their papers. Buy coursework without financial difficulties! A student has to think ahead in essay miller the crucible, terms of finances, and amelia earhart essay, custom writing can become one of the major articles of on a expenditure. Yet what is the point of having a job if you will pay everything you earn for amelia questions, custom papers? To avoid such unfeasible distribution of funds, we have introduced a flexible pricing policy that includes discounts, guarantees, and price leverage factors. Every customer that wants to request our help can adjust the price to fit his or her particular needs. This is done with the help of the following: Adjusting urgency. Extending your deadline will let you save on urgency charges.
Switching off extra convenience services like sms updates and high priority (Although if you order a very important assignment, we don’t recommend using this option). Lowering the quality standard of what writing your paper to get budget instead of premium charge. Essay Questions! Changing the difficulty level. We service customers of all levels starting at secondary school. If you need a school-level assignment, there is no need to ask for university-level quality. In addition, we will be happy to offer you discounts! Currently, there are the following discounts available: First order price-off for new customers. Referral program. Bring friends, get credits for your account when they order, and use these credits for your next order – as easy as that! We also have sales from time to time, so don’t forget to check your email!
And don’t forget – we never apply hidden charges after the initial order cost has been paid. It’s important for essay conclusion, a vast majority of our clients that their information should never be disclosed to third parties. Amelia Essay Questions! To ensure privacy and security, we take measures in two directions. First, your personal information is encrypted and protected with industry-grade methods. Secondly, our company works with only reliable payment providers, which is our primary means to prevent financial fraud and malpractice. By default, we never disclose the names of clients that have used our help. We hope that now you have enough information to decide if our service is suitable to your needs. To request our help without any more delays, please do the following: Complete our ordering form, having filled all the required fields Submit payment details to perform the transactions and have a writer assigned Wait as long as you have specified (the “Deadline” field) for your paper to be delivered. Check on the progress using the essay Personal Area of earhart questions necessary. Your writing problems will become ours in a matter of minutes.
Order now to start benefitting.
Order Your Own Writing Help Now -
Amelia Earhart's new chapter in the …
Free Essays on Book Report On A Novel. Step-by-step There are 5 sections to this book report . Each section is worth 20 points. Do not skip a section. Each section is important to show your understanding of the earhart book you read. Section 1 – Section 1 is a paragraph about the essay award that your book either won outright, or was nominated for. Oral Book Report: Realistic Fiction. ? Oral Book Report : Realistic Fiction Outline due May 11 Presentations: May 14 -18 Option 1: You will be creating and amelia earhart questions presenting your book report to the class using PowerPoint or a similar program. There will be a total five content requirements. For each requirement you will make.
? A BOOK REPORT ON “THE ABDUCTION” A Requirement in essay, English 12 (Developmental Reading) Submitted to: Mrs. Amelia Essay! Bernadette S. Garcia of Mindanao University of notes essay, Science and Technology (MUST) Submitted By: Jealouden G. Alamis BEED-SPED 1X4 February 27, 2015 My book report was written for. How Characters in Apocalyptic Novel Similar. Honor Period 7 May 10, 2013 Similarity in characters of apocalyptic novels . “What is a rebel? A man who says no.”- said Albert Camus, a French Nobel Prize winning author, journalist and philosopher. Post-apocalyptic fiction novels usually use the amelia dystopia society, in which rules have changed and life. Hoot Among many books that were written and later made into films, the relation between the essay quellenangabe two can be vastly different, or practically identical. Amelia Earhart Essay! Though there are many similarities between the for the essay novel Hoot written by Carl Hiaasen, and the film directed by Wil Shriner, there are some differences as well.
Book Report on the Golden Compass. Vanessa Godinez Block 2 12/11/08 Book Report The Golden Compass Main Characters Analysis of earhart essay questions, Major Characters Lyra Belacqua Lyra, the protagonist of the trilogy, is the second Eve. To Pullman, the original Eve depicted in Genesis was not the cause of on smoking, all sin, but the source of all knowledge and. The Man Who Was Thursday- Book Report. Chance Dunlap Fiction Book Report 1st Quarter The novel The Man Who was Thursday by G. K. Chesterton is an incredible work of amelia questions, fiction that thoroughly shows the ingenuity of its author. Essay! The plot has multiple twists and continually forces the reader to ponder the statements of the characters who all.
Xavier Piper Mrs. Ursery English III 10 January 2012 Book Review Assignment: Tenderness of Wolves Summary: The novel , Tenderness of Wolves, by Stef Penny, is a story that starts off with the horrific murder of the amelia earhart French fur trader, Laurent Jammett. Jammett’s body was discovered in his cabin by. caught, he would then report to juvenile hall. 6. What project would you be working on if you were at the Creative Academy? What would you do there all day long? If I were at the Creative Academy, I would like to work on the Butterfly project E.D. is doing. I would probably read books , paint, and is methodology writing catch. Aarkstore Market Research Report - Frontier Pharma Prostate Cancer - Identifying and Commercializing First-in-Class Innovation. ? Aarkstore Market Research Report - Frontier Pharma: Prostate Cancer - Identifying and Commercializing First-in-Class Innovation Summary Exceptionally.
Title of the Book: Message in a Bottle. Road, Domestic Airport, Pasay City A BOOK REPORT Title of the book MESSAGE IN A BOTTLE Presented In Partial Fulfilment Of the amelia earhart essay questions Requirements in Humanities 2 By: Haidee S. Mendoza BST 3-1 3rd Trimester SY 2010-2011 I- The book report is purposely done and written as a part. The Perks of Being a Wallflower Book Report. remembers then that his Aunt Helen used to molest him before she died. His English teacher Bill acquainted him to glass essay, different books and encouraged him to write essays and book reports about them. Amelia Earhart Questions! Bill thought that Charlie was special and very intelligent. For him, Bill is the coolest teacher he ever had. ?Independent Reading Novel Book Review After reading your selected novel , please complete three of the following assignments following the form of short war, a tic-tac-toe win. You must complete three of the activities on the board either diagonally /, horizontally ---, or vertically |. Be sure to read the instructions.
Eng 112-FJT07 22 February 2013 Banned Book Book : I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings Claim: This book should be banned from schools, because of the racism, profanity and earhart essay questions pornographic language. A lot of parents would not want their kids to read such harass language. It made a lot easier for is methodology them to ban. The title page of Henry Fielding’s first novel reads as follows: ‘The history of the adventures of amelia questions, Joseph Andrews and of his friend Mr. Abraham Adams.’ The term picaresque has been derived from the Spanish word picaro which means a rogue or a villain. Originally, a type of introduction for the menagerie, romance that dealt with rogues. he started teaching English and philosophy in Salisbury. He temporarily left teaching in questions, 1940 to essay the crucible, join the Royal Navy.
In 1954 he published his first novel , Lord of the Flies. In 1983, he was awarded the Nobel Prize for Literature. On June 19, 1993, he died in Perranarworthal, Cornwall, England. While Golding. The Popularity of Jane Austen Novels. Austen’s novels so enduringly popular, valid and amelia essay questions critically valued almost two centuries after their publication? What is all this about Jane Austen? What is notes essay, there in her?
What is it all about? -- Joseph Conrad to H.G. Wells in 1901, as recounted in amelia, the current novel The Jane Austen Book Club,. Aarkstore - High Throughput Screening Market Research Report. Screening Market Research Report Browse Full Report @ http://www.aarkstore.com/biotechnology/53582/high-throughput-screening Published: Apr 2014 | No. Of Pages: 708 Pages PDF: $ 4140 | Global Licence : $ 8300 | High Throughput Screening (HTS) Market research report emphasizes on introduction for the essay both the technology. BOOK REPORT The Outsiders By: S.E Hinton(New York: Puffin Books , 1967) The outsider: The Outsiders is about two weeks in the life of a 14-year-old boy. The novel tells the story of Ponyboy Curtis and his struggles with right and wrong in questions, a society in which he believes that he is an outsider. On Arthur Miller The Crucible! The. Dystopian Fiction a Comparison of Three Novels. could possibly happen to essay questions, the world. Three of the most prominent novels that are classified as dystopian literature are Brave New World by Aldous Huxley, 1984 by George Orwell, and Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury.
In each of these novels , the respective author is is methodology in thesis, attempting to accomplish a certain goal. The Giver In the amelia earhart essay book ‘The Giver’ there is a character named Jonas who lives in a futuristic world that is supposedly “perfect”. As the book goes on Lois Lowry shows that this world isn’t really all that perfect. It seems to be missing something that isn’t obvious. Jonas world is missing something. Mariah Murphy English P.3 1/19/09 Book Report Section I George Orwell’s novel 1984 is introduction essay, one of the amelia questions greatest depictions any writer has ever made about the future of government. Although his visualizations have not been entirely accurate, he voiced an incredibly deep and thought provoking opinion about. Book Review of Persepolis The Author of the novel , Persepolis: The Story of what is methodology writing, a Childhood, is Marjane Satrapi. Amelia Questions! The theme in Persepolis is to be aware of where you came from and the history of your family and also the notes scandal culture that you live by. Essay Questions! The subject is linked to the title of the book because; the. Book Report on on arthur the crucible Pride and Prejuice.
Book Report ——Pride and earhart essay Prejudice The great novel , Pride and Prejudice, was written by persuasive essay, an English novelist called Jane Austen in the 19th century. Compare with other masterpiece which seriously pointed out the big, common, “people-often-disregard” problem at that time in the society such. Subj: BOOK REPORT OF “Helmet for essay questions my Pillow” BY ROBERT LECKIE 1. Recommendations a. Audience. I recommend “Helmet for my Pillow” to every single Marine. The book was phenomenal in going into detail about exact events that happened to the 1st Marines during WW2. The author is quellenangabe, writing the amelia essay questions novel in introduction glass, 1st. School Violence A Current Controversies Novel A Book Report Book Edited By: Lucinda Almond The Book : Lucinda Almond ( Book Editor) School Violence – A Current Controversies Novel Farmington Hills, Michigan: The Gale and Greenhaven Press, 2008 232pp. $27.50 0-7377-3796-4 Whether it. Books Can Be Divided Into Two Main Types: Fiction and essay questions Non-Fiction. I prefer to essay, read fiction books rather than non-fiction books . Fiction books make imagination possible, reading them you can travel around the amelia essay questions world, fight against pirates or envisage the future. I acknowledge that non-fiction books are interesting too, but if you read to EXPERIENCE different LIVES it. HOW TO ANALYSE A NOVEL Setting Setting is a description of on arthur miller the crucible, where and amelia questions when the story takes place. •What aspects make up the setting??Geography, weather, time of day, social conditions? •What role does setting play in the story?
Is it an important part of the plot or theme? Or is it just a backdrop. Discuss How Dan Browns Successful Novel the Da Vi. The Da Vinci Code written by Dan Brown has become one of the most popular fiction novels of all time. It has appeared on the New York Times best-seller list for 36 weeks and has sold more than 7.5 million copies world wide. While The Da Vinci Code has many aspects of a great thriller, this does not explain. ?One of the menagerie essay main themes in essay, The Book Thief is that words have the power to destroy and to save lives. More important, however, is that words can change the way a person feels.
Whether written or spoken, words bring the characters in Zusak’s novel happiness, and fear. This novel also shows that words can sometimes. overview. What Is Methodology Writing! B) Summary of the earhart book . C) Paul’s views. In Thesis! G) Conclusion. Foreword: This research paper gives the overview of Remarque’s novel All Quiet on the Western Front. Amelia Earhart Essay! Thesis: In All Quiet on essay the Western Front, Remarque demonstrates the mess caused by the war.
A famous novel by Erich Maria Remarque. The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn is a satirical novel written by Mark Twain that exhibits Twain’s views on racism and slavery. The book is amelia earhart questions, set in persuasive, the deep South during the pre-Civil War era of slavery, about 1835 to essay questions, 1845, and it tells the story of Huck, who is running away from his abusive father. Aarkstore Market Research Report - Frontier Pharma Parkinsons Disease - Identifying and Commercializing First-in-Class Innovation. ? Aarkstore Market Research Report - Frontier Pharma: Parkinsons Disease - Identifying and Commercializing First-in-Class Innovation Summary Large Degree of essay, Innovation. Death Comes for the Archbishop: A Narrative or a Novel ? Is it a narrative or a novel ? Few questions have caused me this much trouble. It became apparent to me that Willa Cather's Death Comes for earhart the Archbishop would not be an easy piece of literature to classify. Within just a few pages, it became. The Good Earth Book Report This book report is written for Humanities III, and the instructor Mr.
Stiles. Essay! It is on The Good Earth, written by Pearl S. Buck. Earhart! It contains 368 pages, and was published by The John Day Company. This book is historical fiction, and persuasive it has won the Pulitzer Prize for. The novel , The Great Gatsby, is an amazing book with great plot and meaning. The book teaches many real-life lessons and even illustrates life in the 1920’s.
F. Amelia! Scott Fitzgerald, like many other authors, was an extremely creative artist with a vision of notes scandal essay, each character, action, and setting. Therefore. ? Last Olympian By: Rick Riordan I must say, when I set out on this specific reading adventure, I was not expecting to amelia earhart, be as in love with this book as I ended up being. It was definitely a good treat. From the beginning Camp Half-Blood set a plan in motion to stop the essay antagonist of the stories The. SNM To: OIC, BOOK REVIEW OF: Ender’s Game BY Lance Corporal SNM Audience: I would recommend this book to amelia essay, all Marines who enjoy reading science fiction fantasy novels . Ender’s game is an award winning novel based solely on essay civil strategy in the battlefield. This book is perfect for squad leaders. assign book reports . Did you ever wonder why?
Sure, you could think of it as a cruel attempt to force you to read. But it might be a little more than that! Your teacher's goal is to broaden your understanding of the world and amelia questions society. That is what in thesis, what good books do! What Is Included in earhart, a Book Report. Choosing Your Book Perhaps your teacher has assigned a specific book for scandal you to essay questions, read. If this is the case you can skip this section and move on to READING THE BOOK . If you are able to pick the book of your choice you must first decide whether you want to read fiction or non-fiction. Do you love reading.
REPORT ON THE EVALUATION OF THE NORTH MELBOURNE LIBRARY. REPORT ON THE EVALUATION OF THE NORTH MELBOURNE LIBRARY 1.0 Introduction - General Overview of the essay conclusion North Melbourne Library The North Melbourne Library is located at 66, Errol Street North Melbourne 3051. The Edifice of the Library is awesome and it is situated next to the North Melbourne Town Hall. Aarkstore Market Research Report - Type 2 Diabetes Therapeutics in Asia-Pacific Markets to 2020 - Increasing Uptake of Novel Drug Classes to Drive Market Growth. Aarkstore Market Research Report - Type 2 Diabetes Therapeutics in Asia-Pacific Markets to 2020 - Increasing Uptake of Novel Drug Classes to Drive Market Growth Summary GBI Research.
Book Report on earhart questions Pride and Prejudice. Book Report on Pride and Prejudice The author of Pride and Prejudice is essay, Jane Austen who was born in Steventon, Hampshire, in the south of England, in 1775 and died at the age of 41. She began writing at the age of fourteen as entertainment for her family. Amelia! Austen’s early writing often made gentle. Parenthetical Referencing and Book Report. Human Beings Need Love Rather Than Warfare. Persuasive On Smoking! --Book Report. Lost in the ending of earhart, , I realized I had finished this book . On Arthur The Crucible! This is a book concerning with love and war—the permanent themes of novels . Ernest Hemingway, a great American novelist, was well-known for his novel . Amelia Questions! As far as I am concerned, he was a tough guy leading a hard life which shaped his personality. How Significant Is the Theme of Loneliness in the Novel? The theme loneliness is persuasive on smoking, very significant in this novel . Earhart Essay Questions! Almost all characters in the book are lonely in short essay war, one way or the other. The main characters of the book are George and Lennie. Even though these two seem to have each other, they are both lonesome in a way.
Lennie is earhart, dumb and unaware of everything. Life and women in Hardy's novels: A critical analysis. ? Pahel 1 Life and Women in introduction glass essay, Hardy’s Novels : A Critical Analysis Name: Pahel Chakma ID: 333-17-08 Supervisor: Shafin Md. John Lecturer Department of English Southern University Bangladesh This thesis submitted. Cold Mountain Film/Novel Comparison.
the true characteristics and feelings of each character will almost certainly change due to the wider audience the movie is reaching out too. In the novel , the writer attempts to fully develop each situation with every twist and turn that follows it, while in amelia, the film the ideas are dulled down in writing, order. ?A Book Report Roll of earhart questions, Thunder, Hear My Cry is short civil war, a famous historical fiction by amelia questions, Mildred Taylor, an African American writer. It was published by essay on arthur, the Penguin Group in 1991, including 276 pages. It mainly tells us the conflicts between black and white and how black fought against racism. The main characters. Is Del-Del by Victor Kelleher a Gripping Book? Is Kelleher a Good Writer.
perturbed the reader. We also found that the shifting of genre bewildered the amelia earhart essay reader and was too big a risk for such a small book . To keep the reader from becoming uninterested in the book , a good thriller author would drop various hints, or trails. Short Civil War! These trails are usually a probable idea of what could be. Is The Graveyard Book A Coming of Age Novel ? Is the Graveyard Book by Neil Gaiman a coming of amelia, age story? To start, a coming of age novel typically includes; a life from start to adulthood, a characters view point changing as he learns and develops in the environment around him, and a character gaining. Animal Farm is a dystopian novel by George Orwell. Published in England on 17 August 1945, the book reflects events leading up to and during the Stalin era before World War II. On A Scandal Essay! Orwell, a democratic socialist and a member of the earhart Independent Labour Party for scandal many years, was a critic of Joseph Stalin. Oprah’s Book Club Oprah’s Book Club has become the most popular and influential literary discussion since its creation in 1996. Earhart! Oprah was able to encourage change throughout America by promoting literacy through her talk show. Ted Striphas explores the cultural politics of for the menagerie, Oprah’s Book Club.
the novelist George Orwell is the pen-name of the novelist Eric Arthur Blair. He was born in essay, 1903 in India and died in what in thesis writing, 1950. He is famous for amelia earhart essay questions his novels , mainly 1984 and Animal farm, but also worked as a journalist, essayist and essay critic. His literary work mostly deals with social injustice and opposition. girlfriend as well as the continuous flashbacks. Intrigue - the novel is filled with mysterious characters, for amelia earhart questions example the essay miller the crucible people that come after Bourne, he doesn’t know who they are and what side they work for. Not only that but the novel has multiple twists and turn. Love - the woman that Bourne kidnaps. Sherlock Holmes Vol 2 - Book Report.
Book Report Title of the Book : SHERLOCK HOLMES (The Complete Novels and amelia questions Stories Volume II): The Hound the in thesis Baskerville Literary Type: Fictional Novel (Mystery) Author’s name: Sir Arthur Conan Doyle Publisher: A Division of Random House, Inc. New York, New York Date of Publication: . Dracula Book Analysis Bram Stoker’s Dracula is a Gothic novel it was first published in 1897. Amelia Earhart Essay Questions! Bram Stoker’s Dracula consists of 316 pages, made into menagerie, 27 chapters. Dracula is based in questions, approximately late 1700’s and early 1800’s. The book’s main settings are in two places London and Transylvania. The tone. of 2002, I was curious about Cathi Hanauer's 1996 novel My Sister's Bones, so I picked it up at a Border's book store. Miller! I'm a sucker for books about eating disorders, although I'm starting to essay, outgrow that particular interest. I was thinking this book might be interesting because it promised a story about. Language Arts Multimedia Book Report.
Multimedia Book Report Language Arts When you have finished reading the novel , create a multimedia book report . Your report should include the following elements: Background information about the setting of the essay war novel Animated story map Explanation of the novel’s themes Critique of the. Why would All Quiet On The Western Front be berated and even burnt by the Germans in 1933, and why is it hailed by others as the greatest novel of the amelia earhart questions First World War? ?Why would All Quiet On The Western Front be berated and even burnt by the Germans in 1933, and why is it hailed by others as the greatest novel of the First World War? The attitude in Germany towards Erich Maria Remarque’s All Quiet On The Western Front in 1933 has to be considered in the greater.